..Information to Pharmacists
    _______________________________

    Your Monthly E-Magazine
    NOVEMBER, 2002

    Published by Computachem Services

    P.O Box 297.
    Alstonville. 2477
    NSW Australia

    Phone:
    61 2 66285138

    E-Mail
    This
    Page
    Click For a
    Printer-Friendly
    Page
    Bookmark
    This Page


    CON BERBATIS

    A Research Perspective

    Clinical Testing in Pharmacies -
    First Results From the 2002 Survey of Australia’s Pharmacies

    A little-known government review and initial results from the recently completed national survey may open the doors to a new era of clinical testing in Australia’s community pharmacies.
    In its July draft report the Commonwealth Review of Pathology Arrangements under Medicare supported Point of Care Testing (PoCT) in pharmacies.
    Submissions made in 2000 by the Pharmacy Guild and Curtin University’s Professor Bruce Sunderland and Con Berbatis featured in almost 10% of both the Review’s 145 page Background report and the 33 page final Draft examining PoCT.
    It recommended “..The current regulatory arrangements should be amended to provide for the point of care testing where its clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness can be demonstrated….”

    PoCT was first reported in the 1980s from hospital emergency wards in the USA where bedside testing was used to overcome poor after hours laboratory services and the long turnaround time from the ordering to the delivery of test results. In primary health care settings PoCT is the on site measurement of anthropometric or body parameters (eg body weight, height and waist circumference for obesity ), body function (eg peak flow for respiratory performance ) and the analysis of specimens for the purposes of screening, diagnosis or monitoring. PoCT or clinical testing in community pharmacies both overseas and in Australia have had a chequered career due mainly to legal and technical difficulties such as drawing specimens, quality control and low profits (refer to C Berbatis. Essential CPE - Clinical Testing. PSA Nov.2000 : page5).

    Overseas, these hurdles in North America and the UK have resulted in the large groups of community pharmacies there confining their clinical testing activities to just selling home or external testing products. We presumed the same trend in Australia’s community pharmacies with perhaps less than 200 or under 4% of all pharmacies nationwide offering tests for screening and monitoring but not diagnostic purposes. But the patterns or rates of clinical testing or any health-related activity occurring in pharmacies anywhere in the world are largely unknown because there are few or no published reports with reliable national figures. Hence the potential value of the results received from 82% of respondents in the first national survey of health-related activities occurring in Australia’s community pharmacies. (see editor's notes below)

    Screening for high blood pressure, cholesterol and glucose , referral of undiagnosed clients with raised results and corrective actions are part of a big potential role in prevention for pharmacists or other health workers. Providing vaccines and issuing chemo-preventive agents such as mini-dose aspirin to prevent heart disease in adults with cardiovascular risk factors or folate for pregnant females to prevent neural tube defects in offspring are other forms of primary prevention practiced, to a hitherto unknown degree, by pharmacists.

    The Guild submitted to the above Review that Australia’s 4,800 community pharmacies provide ready access to facilities, agents and services which improve health for the public. This now appears crucial given the high proportion of undetected risk factors in Australia amenable to screening tests and the potential costs savings. For example the AusDiab national survey in 2000 discovered some 500,000 people with undiagnosed diabetes. That is, they had been missed by the existing health system! The incidence of diabetes is much higher than the rate of diagnosis therefore the surge in Type 2 diabetes and costs (average $3000 per diabetic per year) will continue unless more effective forms of screening, referral and primary preventive interventions are introduced.

    In Curtin University’s School of Pharmacy we are analysing the results of a survey of all community pharmacies stratified into Pharia zone 1 ( 15% randomised) and Pharia zones 2 to 6 combined, conducted from 12 July to September. The sample size , high rate and representativeness of respondents allows facilities and activities in under 1% of Australia’s pharmacies to be analysed with 95% confidence in each Pharia zone.

    The rates ( per month) and range of clinical tests ( anthropometric, cholesterol, glucose, blood pressure, bone density, pregnancy and other types) for screening of undiagnosed clients are being quantified. Nationally, over 10% of pharmacies reported screening one or more clients monthly for blood pressure and blood glucose, or over 5% for bone density, pregnancy and anthropometric and under 5% for blood cholesterol or other tests. Each of these national figures must be analysed in detail and stratified. We must also characterise ( eg by Pharia zone, shopping centre type and franchise group) the top testing pharmacies (21 or more clients tested monthly) .

    Survey results showed almost 5% of pharmacies across Pharia zones have community clinic services with nurses. A meta-analysis of 81 intervention studies in primary prevention found “.. teamwork (involving nurses) and collaboration …” was the best in improving referrals and the effectiveness of interventions (Ann Intern Med 2002;136: 641-51). In addition to their demonstrated effectiveness in primary prevention, nurses can overcome the problems of specimen collection, acceptability by doctors and cost which inhibit pharmacies currently (refer to C Berbatis. Essential CPE - Clinical Testing. PSA Nov.2000 : page5).

    We found almost 50% of Australia’s largest pharmacies are in franchise groups. One group of 41 pharmacies in South Australia and Victoria engage registered nurses who circulated up to 10 times per year to conduct screening tests in consenting pharmacy clients (undiagnosed). Based on January-June 2002 results they screen over 12,000 cases in 12 months for hyperglycaemia, hypercholesterolaemia and hypertension of whom approximately 15% are referred to doctors at a cost to the group of less than $10 per referral By extrapolating these rates to Australia’s 4800 pharmacies the national annual referral rates total 36,000 cases for hyperglycaemia, 105,000 for hypertension and 86,000 for hypercholesterolaemia.

    If doctors examined and managed effectively to defer or prevent type 2 diabetes in just 25% of the referred hyperglycaemia patients then gross savings exceeding $27 million for less than $0.5 million yearly outlay by pharmacies are feasible. Australia’s incidence (new cases) of type 2 diabetes may be cut by 10-20% per annum. Other flow-on benefits to this pharmacy group have sustained their continuing engagement of nurses. Analogous estimates of numbers, savings, lowered incidence and flow-on benefits to pharmacies may be made for the other screening tests. These promising results need to be properly assessed and the opportunities created for exploring these and other screening tests in this and other groups of pharmacies.

    The recommendation by the government review combined with initial results from respondent pharmacies in the national survey reveal potential cost-benefits of pharmacy groups engaging nurses.
    Analogous benefits are emerging from the results of the national survey for other activities such as vaccination which have large health and cost-benefit potential for Australia and community pharmacies but are in danger of being lost by them.
    Even at this early stage the evaluation of groups of or individual pharmacies who currently engage nurses is warranted given the impressive potential of and danger of losing some of the crucial health activities they do or could perform in pharmacies.


    Con Berbatis FPS(WA), MSc(Syd)
    School of Pharmacy
    Curtin University of Technology
    Western Australia
    Email : berbatis@git.com.au
    October 2002

    Editor's Note:
    Pharmacists should make themselves familiar with all the work that Con Berbatis is involved with.
    i2P hopes to be in a position to publish more, as the information is made available.
    Con is interested in introducing the concept that franchised market groups need to develop their perspective in promoting and competing with professional services. Given that 50 percent of Australian pharmacies belong to a franchise and that 75 percent of revenue passes through them, are they the vehicle for this type of development? If so, what should they do?
    He is also concerned with the loss of dispensing business e.g. influenza vaccines to the over 65's and meningococcal vaccines to the under 14's, and is exploring the thought that a select group of pharmacies become primary health care centres and utilise the services of nurses.
    He is developing the evidence to reinforce pharmacy's professional role in the format that governments need to base their decisions.
    This is important work.
    You are recommended to view the site http://www.curtin.edu.au/curtin/dept/pharmacy/survey/index.html
    and in particular, view questions 7 (on page 2) and 18 (on page 6) in the Pharmacy Survey.
    Pharmacists need to be interactive to help shape this important work, and Con Berbatis would like to hear your views, suggestions, and further analysis of the results direct.
    Please take the time to communicate to him through the active e-mail address noted just above this paragraph.
    We have also published extracts of the survey results as displayed on the above website.

    RESULTS

    Response by Pharia zone and total at 19 September 2002

    Introduction
    The first round of mailed questionnaires commenced on 12 July 2002, the second round began 2 August and the third and final round from 16 August.

    The original sample of 1641 (middle columns) was generated by the statistician in June 2002 and represented a 15% random sample of all state-registered community pharmacies in Pharia zone 1 and all pharmacies in Pharia zones 2-6. These were culled and phoned in late June by the Survey Research Centre (SRC) to obtain the consent of participating pharmacies and the name and contact identification of the pharmacist respondent for each consenting pharmacy. The questionnaire was constructed and produced professionally under Con Berbatis and Prof Bruce Sunderland of the Curtin University’s School of Pharmacy. The SRC performed the mailed surveys, electronically entered the data responses and obtained data from non-respondents.

    The procedures of Dillman (2000) were followed for the conduct of the survey conducted and the construction, testing and design of the questionnaire.

    The responses were electronically entered and the first summary was produced in August 2002. The following summary (Table 1) compares the number and distribution of completed questionnaires received by 9 September 2002 and categorised by Pharia zone (left).

    Results
    In brief, the responses demonstrate that the level of response obtained (left columns) far exceeded the minimum numbers required, and the distribution accorded well with the original sample (middle).
    The total response of 81% by September 9 and over 82% by 16 September was outstanding and ranks first or in the top rank of pharmacy or medical surveys ever conducted in the world.

    The frequency data for each section and question in were produced by the SRC on 18th September.

    Table 1. Rates and distribution of pharmacy respondents’ questionnaires : July-September 2002 (Source: Survey Research Centre, University of Western Australia, 18 September 2002)



    Comments
    These initial results will lead to cross-tabulating the data by 1 October (for initial categorising of responses by Pharia zones and other groupings), before the final process of statistical analysis to test relationships between features of the pharmacies (for example the qualifications of proprietors and staff or the range of facilities and the rate of use of these or the rate and range of services provided). This final process will occur in October and November 2002 for the final report to be concluded and published by February 2003. Papers and reports have been published in pharmacy journals (Berbatis, 2002).

    References
    Berbatis CG. National survey of Australia’s community pharmacies in 2002 : rationale and methodology. J Pharm Pract Res 2002; 32: 143-6.

    Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. Second edition. New York : John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
    Source: Con Berbatis FPS(WA), MSc(Syd) School of Pharmacy Curtin University of Technology Western Australia berbatis@git.com.au


    Back to Front Page