As I sit here in front on my word processor the thought comes to me 
          "Am I a slow learner, or what?"  
          After some eight years working with our Veteran Community you would 
          think that I would have had the two prime rules of defence forces drilled 
          into me.  
          These are of course: 
          * "Never stick your head up or you'll get it blown off" and,  
          * "Never, never volunteer"  
        So, why 
          do I raise this question?  
          I broke the first rule, of course, when I wrote a letter to the editor 
          of this newsletter, placing me squarely in the sights of anyone who 
          disagrees with my ideas. Then to compound my "error" I accepted an offer 
          from Neil (the editor) to become a regular contributor. "Slow learner" 
          obviously describes me. 
        Now, self 
          flagellation aside, I would like to consider a story that appeared on 
          our local radio news this morning. "Cost blow out threatens PBS" blared 
          out, highlighting a 50% increase in PBS programme costs over the past 
          five years. "Surprising" I thought "seeing that PBS expenditure had 
          been rising by some 12-15% per year, a 50% increase is relatively conservative!" 
           
          Headlines such as this should strike fear into Australian pharmacists 
          as no government can continue to accept cost rises of this magnitude. 
          Something will have to give and pharmacy may find itself between a rock 
          and a hard place.  
          I remember when I started my career in community pharmacy (in the middle 
          to late 1960s) we operated on a 33% mark-up plus dispensing fee. This 
          at least gave pharmacy an opportunity to expand it role while remaining 
          viable and accounts for the profession's habit of offering so many free 
          services.  
          As the margin was decreased to 20%, then 10% and below the buffer was 
          lost but the expectation of free advice and counselling remained. 
           
          We now have the situation where pharmacists want (indeed are expected) 
          to move into more pharmacy profession orientated activities but do not 
          have the necessary resources. 
          What happens if the margin is reduced even further? 
          Cost pressures are going to increase the importance of quality use of 
          medicines (QUM) programmes to government. 
          The Department of Veterans' Affairs (my employer) has for many years 
          been involved in such QUM programmes, educating prescribers and Veteran 
          patients on more appropriate use of drugs.  
          Although we were the first, other departments have taken up the programmes, 
          signalling that government is serious about costs and opening a window 
          of opportunity (don't you love that expression?) for pharmacy.  
          What profession is more qualified to advise and assist in getting value 
          for money in relation to drugs? 
           
          It has been interesting to see the angst that has been caused in the 
          medical profession by the advent of medication reviews by pharmacists, 
          but we, as a group, are specialists and must be seen to be contributing. 
          Domiciliary Medication Management Reviews (DMMR) has been a hot topic 
          in the past three (March-May) issues of "Australian Pharmacist", raising 
          a number of issues I would like to explore in future articles. DMMR, 
          however, is an avenue by which pharmacy can demonstrate its ability 
          to give value for money in drug use and we should embrace the chance 
          to "trot our stuff".  
          (Sorry, I'm having a bad day-I am not usually prone to talking in cliches.) 
          Please note that opinions expressed here are my own and not necessarily 
          those of my Department.  
          Ends 
           
         
      
         
           
              
              Previous Article 
                
           | 
           
             
                
              Next Article  
           | 
         
       
      
      The 
        comments and views expressed in the above article are those of the author 
        and no other. The author welcomes any comment and interaction that may 
        result from this and future articles.  
      * 
        If you have found value in this newsletter, please share it with a friend, 
        or alternatively, encourage a colleague to subscribe at neilj@computachem.com.au 
        . 
        * Don't forget to advise of any change in your e-mail address so that 
        your subscription may be continued without interruption.  
        * Letters to the editor are encouraged, or if you have material you would 
        like published, please forward to the editor.  
        * You are invited to visit the Computachem web site at http://www.computachem.com.au 
        .  
        * Any interested persons who would like to receive this free newsletter 
        on their desktop each fortnight, please send a single word e-mail "Subscribe" 
        to neilj@computachem.com.au 
        .  
        * Looking for an organised reference site for medical or other references? 
        Why not try (and bookmark) the Computachem 
        Interweb Directory , for an easily accessed range of medical and pharmacy 
        links, plus a host of pharmacy relevant links.  
        The directory also contains a very fast search engine for Internet enquiries 
         
      Back 
        to Article Index 
        Article 
        Archive 2000 
        Article 
        Archive 2001 
        Home 
     |