Home

Article Archive
2000  2001

Editor:
Neil Johnston

Columnists:
Rollo Manning
Leigh Kibby

Jon Aldous
Roy Stevenson
Brett Clark


Free Subscription!
Enter Details
Email Address:
Name:
E-Newsletter.... PUBLISHED TWICE A MONTH
MAY,Edition # 25, 2001

[Home] [About The Newsletter] [Topics Covered] [Testimonials]

LEIGH KIBBY

* Place cursor on photograph for author details.

* Click on photograph to view list of previous articles by this author.

MANAGEMENT:
Taming the Office Tyrant


. We all know who the office tyrant is, whose territory is littered with corpses and marked with angry growls, expletives, invective language and acerbic memos.
All these signify the domain upon which the wary tread gently and the uninformed stumble dangerously.
Either the indignant official, disapproving parent or outraged executive are behavioural hallmarks of the tyrant who often wins through fear, threat and bluster.
But, in the end, no-one wins when the savage beast is loose, least of all the beast.
However, the dilemma is what to do with the tyrant.
Venturing into the den can be as fearful for CEOs as it is for staff, particularly when the tyrant represents a hefty investment in years and income and who also has strong "political" affiliations within an organisation.
We all know that some-one, anyone, must do more than simple bell the cut.
A tune needs to be sung to the savage beast and, even better, it should be tamed.
Three case scenarios might be of interest.
One was a senior executive who included the "magic word" when giving feedback. Another often threatened to sack or end the life of perpetrators of minor indiscretions, whilst still another played disapproving parent scolding wayward children.
The cause may change and the excuse may be disguised by a dedication to professionalism or focus on quality, but an angry response is always linked with fear for oneself.
So, the tyrant yells when toe job does not go right, the perfectionist threatens and the disapproving parent uses emotional blackmail to force the action they want, or prevent similar occurrences happening again.
In each case, the first step is to remember the behavioural trigger.
This does not mean the
event, which is a the activating event. The key is to understand the emotion and in all cases it was fear - whenever you see a fight (or flight) response you can be sure that fear is the trigger.
In handling the "difficult cases" passed to us, we followed the "Dalai" LAMA Method

- Listening, Acknowledgment, Mentoring, and Action Planning.

So, the first step was to "hear" the tyrant …. really hear!
In your organisation, that means, a senior person listening to the tyrant and communicating what has been heard.
This will do two things:

1. it will model forgiveness (but not necessarily acceptance) of failure/indiscretions which will always reduce a climate of fear; and
2. it will acknowledge the validity of the concern which will empower and strengthen the tyrant, who will consequently feel less afraid and so less likely to attack.

Acknowledgment was a critical step because it involved reflecting on successes and occasions when the outburst was withheld, which built a basis of success - a strong foundation for building change. Mentoring involved jointly developing :

1. action plans
for preventing recurrence of the activating event;
2. discussing occasions when similar feelings were shared;
3. restating the behavioural parameters and expectations of the role, position and organisational style; and
4. modelling alternative outlooks and responses.

Action Planning meant jointly creating circuit breakers that were put in place between the activating event and outburst, plus incentives for change and when and how they are given.
In two out of three cases, these strategies worked very well.
In one case, all these soft skills went only so far because the fear and behavioural patterns were deeply entrenched.
So, we added CWIT Face - Cold Water in the Face.
This meant during one session we added a discussion about the consequences of repeating the offending behaviour.
Of course, the fear level went up again but, any truly effective Mentoring also involves reality testing.
In this instance, the shock was enough to cause a halt, rethink and gave breathing space for a new behavioural pattern to become established.

ends


Previous Article

Next Article
Back to Article Index

The comments and views expressed in the above article are those of the author and no other. The author welcomes any comment and interaction that may result from this and future articles, and can be contacted directly by
e-mail at kinematic@bigpond.com , or you can visit Leigh's website at http://www.kinematic.com.au .
Alternatively, the editor would be pleased to publish any responses directed to neilj@computachem.com.au .

* If you have found value in this newsletter, please share it with a friend, or alternatively, encourage a colleague to subscribe at neilj@computachem.com.au .
* Don't forget to advise of any change in your e-mail address so that your subscription may be continued without interruption.
* Letters to the editor are encouraged, or if you have material you would like published, please forward to the editor.
* You are invited to visit the Computachem web site at http://www.computachem.com.au .
* Any interested persons who would like to receive this free newsletter on their desktop each fortnight, please send a single word e-mail "Subscribe" to neilj@computachem.com.au .
* Looking for an organised reference site for medical or other references? Why not try (and bookmark) the Computachem Interweb Directory , for an easily accessed range of medical and pharmacy links, plus a host of pharmacy relevant links.
The directory also contains a very fast search engine for Internet enquiries

Back to Article Index
Article Archive 2000
Article Archive 2001
Home